On 11^th and 12^th of September 2024, the final MEMOCRACY Conference ‘Memory Rights and Memory Wrongs’ took place in Munich, Germany. It was organized jointly by the German MEMOCRACY team from the University of Cologne and the School of History and the Center for Advanced Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences (LMU).

MEMOCRACY Principal Investigators, early career researchers and invited guests gathered for a two-day event to present and discuss the outputs of the consortium’s work over the last three years. The first panel of the conference, chaired by Prof. Angelika Nußberger (University of Cologne) was dedicated to the presentation of comprehensive study reports by MEMOCRACY post-doctoral researchers (former and current): Dr. Paula Rhein-Fischer (University of Cologne), Dr. Anna Wójcik (Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland, and Max Planck Institute of Comparative Public Law and of International Law, Heidelberg, Germany), Dr. Miroslaw Sadowski (Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland). Dr. Dovilė Sagatienė (Copenhagen University, Denmark), and Dr. Andrii Nekoliak (Asser Institute, The Hague, Netherlands).

The study reports and policy briefs, including in national languages, examining memory laws in Germany, Poland and Hungary, the Baltic states, Russia and Ukraine, can be found at the research consortium website under the section on Policy Briefs. The presentation of the reports was followed with panels by MEMOCRACY PIs and leading scholars from various European institutions in the field of international law, memory studies, history pertaining to remembrance and foreign policies, memory in the digital age, memory politics and populism in European affairs.

Last but not least, Prof. Mykola Gnatovskyy, the Ukrainian judge at the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), delivered an insightful key note lecture entitled “Regulating memory in Europe: A Tool to Protect Human Rights and Rule of Law or a Weapon to Destroy Them?”.

The full conference program, including the speakers’ biographies and topics, is available here.

Pictured on a photo (from left to right) are the Principle Investigators of the MEMOCRACY project: Dr. Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias (Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland), Prof. Angelika Nußberger (University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany), Dr. Uladzilau Belavusau (T.M.C. Asser Institute, The Hague, University of Amsterdam), and Prof. Maria Mälksoo (University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark).

On 30 May 2024, a workshop, jointly organized by the Dutch MEMOCRACY team (Dr. Ulad Belavusau and Dr. Andrii Nekoliak) and Prof. Monika Báar (EUI), took place at the premises of the European University Institute (Florence, Italy).

This was the last of the MEMOCRACY consortium workshops dedicated to the country studies (with previous workshops covering Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Latvia, and Lithuania), this time co-organized by the History Department of the EUI and the Asser Institute, and dedicated to memory laws and policies of Russia and Ukraine.

The first panel of the workshop, chaired by Dr. Ulad Belavusau (Asser senior researcher in European law), focused on the presentation and critical discussion with scholars and practitioners in the field of the Study Report by Dr. Andrii Nekoliak (T.M.C. Asser postdoctoral researcher). His study report that will be finalized in the summer 2024, taking on board the recommendations received during the workshop, in particular, from the leading specialists on transitional justice, European law and memory politics, including Prof Adam Łazowski (University of Westminster, UK), Prof Buhm-Suk Baek (Kyung Hee University Law School, South Korea), Prof Nikolay Koposov (Georgia Tech, USA), Anastasiia Vorobiova (Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland).

In his presentation, Dr. Andrii Nekoliak unpacked the various legal measures that regulate the representation of the historical past, comparing the legal developments in Russia and Ukraine. In recent years, the topic of memory laws has been actively discussed in the comparative scholarship in the context of the legal bans on historical speech, proliferating in Central and Eastern Europe, since the 2010s. The diverse ways in which states approach the historical past as well as the compatibility of such legislation with international and European law, in particular with the European Convention on Human Rights, are often at stake.

Moreover, the ramifications of memory laws are profound internationally and domestically. Russia’s war in Ukraine spotlights the mobilization of historical memory for a military conflict. Vladimir Putin’s rationale for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 advanced a quasi-historical justification that denied the legitimacy of Ukraine’s statehood and a claim about denazification. Domestically alike, Russian memory laws bear a particularly repressive character.

In the second part of the workshop, a panel of the renowned scholars and experts discussed and contextualized Russia’s and Ukraine’s trajectories of legal regulation of historical memories further. Dr Tatiana Zhurzhenko (ZOiS, Germany) focused closely on Ukraine’s experiences with its De-communisation Laws of 2015. Dr Karolina Koziura (EUI) spoke about the first Ukraine’s punitive law, the 2006 Holodomor Law, in the context of the politics of memory in Ukraine. Prof Nikolay Koposov (Georgia Tech, USA) addressed the issue of Soviet Russia’s legislation on historical memory and how it has affected the developments in post-Soviet Russia since 1990s. In his panel remarks, Ilya Nuzov (International Federation for Human Rights, FIDH, France) addressed memory politics and the state of affairs in the Russian civil society since Russia has invaded Ukraine in February 2022.

Initially, when the MEMOCRACY project was designed in 2021 – that is before the fully-fledged Russian invasion in Ukraine – this workshop on memory laws in Ukraine and Russia, was planned to be held in Kyiv. For the obvious reasons, organizing it in Ukraine in spring 2024 would have been problematic. Therefore, the EUI was chosen as the leading European university, due to its international character and several relevant interdisciplinary units with leading senior and junior scholars in the field of law, history and memory politics.

The current workshop, consolidating lawyers, historians, political scientists and IR specialists (from the MEMOCRACY project, the EUI history and law departments, Robert Schuman Center, School of Transnational Governance, guests from Ghent University) was the final one in the sequence of MEMOCRACY workshops and will be proceeded with the MEMOCRACY concluding conference in Munich (Germany), in September 2024.

The study reports and policy briefs (including in national languages) from these workshops can be found here, including the study report of on Ukraine and Russia, that will be finalized during the summer 2024, taking on board the recommendations received during this workshop in Florence.

MEMOCRACY Principal Investigators, early career researchers and invited guests discussed a draft report on memory laws in Germany, prepared by Dr. Paula Fischer, the post-doctoral researcher at the MEMOCRACY team at the University of Cologne, and Simon Messing, a P.h.D. candidate at the University of Cologne. The invited experts Prof. Anna-Bettina Kaiser, Dr. Reut Yael Paz and Dr. Stefanie Rauch contributed insightful comment.

The workshop was followed by the first public event of MEMOCRACY, which centered on Putin’s abuse of history in his obscure reasoning for invasion of Ukraine.

In his escalating speech of 21 February 2022, three days before the Russian invasion of Ukraine, President Putin made clear: In his view, Ukraine is “an inalienable part of [Russia’s] own history, cultural and spiritual space” that needs to be “de-nazified” which gives Russia the right to subjugate it. This narrative, a complete distortion of historical facts, is central to Putin’s claim that its brutal drive for expansion and restoration of the Soviet Union is politically and morally justified. If the rewriting of history, including by legal means, has been part of many States’ foreign strategy for a long time, the weight given to an official narrative of the past and the effects created have rarely been so huge. The questions arising at this beginning of a new era of international relations are numerous: Which factors have contributed to the fact that such a detachment from historical reality could be formulated and are believed by some today; what does it mean – for Ukraine, its neighbors and beyond – when memory governance is no longer limited to serving ontological security interests but openly pursues expansionist purposes; and what can the European States do to preserve not only their past but also their core values and an international order that is based on law?

These questions among others were discussed by the four panelists: Dr. Uladzilau Belavusau (T.M.C. Asser Institute, The Hague, University of Amsterdam), Dr. Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias (Institute of Legal Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences), Prof. Dr. Fabian Klose (Chair for International History and Historical Peace and Conflict Research, University of Cologne) and Dr. Maria Mälksoo (Centre for Military Studies, University of Copenhagen). The panel was chaired by Prof. Dr. DDr. h.c. Angelika Nußberger M.A. (Academy for European Human Rights Protection, University of Cologne).

The MEMOCRACY Tallinn Seminar took place at the Vabamu Museum of Occupations and Freedom in Tallinn, Estonia on June 16, 2023.

Dr Maria Mälksoo, MEMOCRACY Principal Investigator (University of Copenhagen, Denmark) opened the seminar.

In the first part of the event, MEMOCRACY Principal Investigators, early career researchers and invited guests discussed a draft report on memory laws in three Batic states, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, prepared by the MEMOCRACY team at University of Copenhagen.

Dr Dovilė Sagatienė presented the draft report.

Prof. Justinas Žilinskas (Mykolas Romeris University, Institute of International and EU Law, Vilnius), Dr Elīna Grigore-Bāra (University of Latvia, Faculty of Law) and Dr Eva-Clarita Pettai (Imre Kertész Kolleg Jena) provided their insightful comments.

An interdisciplinary debate between the panellists, the MEMOCRACY team members and the audience followed

MEMOCRACY Tallinn Seminar concluded with a roundtable on the theme ‚How to defend memory?‘ with arepresentative roundup of Estonian experts: Dr Mari-Liis Madisson (University of Tartu), Andres Parmas (Estonian Prosecutor General), Toomas Hiio (Estonian Institute of Historical Memory) and Prof. Vello Pettai (ECMI).

The MEMOCRACY Tallinn Seminar took place on the heels of June 14, the day of commemorating the June 1941 deportations by the Soviet Union in the Baltic states. The project team learned further about this tragic chapter in the Baltic history from touring the permanent exhibition of the Vabamu Museum.

On 12 March 2024, a unique – in its international scope – MEMOCRACY workshop took place at the premises of the T.M.C. Asser Institute in the Hague.

The MEMOCRACY project has brought a cohort of scholars from Latin America and East Asia to explore the topic of ‘memory laws’ and legal governance of history as a worldwide phenomenon. The workshop has unpacked how various legal measures govern the representation of the historical past. Most recently, the topic of memory laws has been actively discussed in the comparative scholarship in the context of the legal bans on historical speech, proliferating in, particular, in Central and Eastern Europe, since the 2010s.  The theme of the workshop explored memory laws further, beyond the geographic scope of Europe. The event gathered legal scholars, experts from social sciences and practitioners from Latin America and East Asia discussing the diverse ways these regions have been dealing with memory laws and memory policies.

The current workshop was the result of earlier exchanges with East Asian researchers in Tokyo and Seoul, as well as with  Latin American researchers in Brazil, culminating in the unique connection of the workshop organised in The Hague. 

Prof Yunjeong Joo (Pusan National University, South Korea), Prof Satoshi Yokodaido (Keio University, Japan), Prof Junko Kotani (Shizuoka University, Japan), Dr Vincent K.L. Chang (Leiden University, the Netherlands), Dr Sandra M. Rios Oyola (Utrecht University, the Netherlands), Prof Carlos Pérez Ricart (Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, and Commissioner in the Commission on Access to Truth, Historical Clarification and Justice for Serious Human  Rights Violations in Mexico,1965-1990, Mexico), Prof André Andrade (Judge and Professor at UNESA, Universidade Estácio de Sá, Brazil), and Dr Mirosław Sadowski (University of Strathclyde, UK) provided their insightful presentations.

The MEMOCRACY Warsaw Seminar took place on December, 9, 2022 at the Polish Academy of Sciences in Poland.

Dr. Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias, MEMOCRACY Principal Investigator (Institute of Law Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences) opened the seminar.

In the first part of the event, MEMOCRACY Principal Investigators, early career researchers and invited guests discussed a draft report on memory laws in Poland and Hungary prepared by the MEMOCRACY team at the Polish Academy of Sciences.

Dr. Anna Wójcik and Mirosław Sadowski presented the draft report.

Prof. Gabór Halmai (European University Institute), Dr. Marina Bán (University of Copenhagen), Prof. Ireneusz Kamiński (Polish Academy of Sciences), Prof. Marcin Górski (University of Łódź) provided their insightful comments.

(Institute of Law Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences and the Hertie School in Berlin).

In the second part of the event, Prof. Angelika Nussberger, MEMOCRACY Principal Investigator (Academy of Human Rights Protection, University of Cologne), Dr. Maria Mälksoo, MEMOCRACY Principal Investigator (University of Copenhagen), Prof. Michał Bilewicz (University of Warsaw), and Prof. Wulf Kanstainer (Aarhus University) engaged in interdisciplinary debate about historical crimes’ denialism, chaired by Dr. Uladzislau Belavusau, MEMOCRACY Principal Investigator (T.M.C. Asser Institute).